Clinical Study Clinical and Functional Outcomes following Primary Repair versus Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament for Recurrent Patellar Instability

Background. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair or reconstruction. Methods. Fourteen knees that underwent MPFL repair and nine (F5, M4) knees that underwent reconstruction at our institution were evaluated for objective and subjective outcomes. The mean age at operation was 20.1 years for repair and 19.8 years for reconstruction. All patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up (range: 24-75 months). Patient subjective outcomes were obtained using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Kujala patellofemoral subjective evaluations, as well as Visual Analog (VAS) and Tegner Activity Scales. Bilateral isometric quadriceps strength and vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) and vastus lateralis (VL) surface EMG were measured during maximal isometric quadriceps contractions at 30 ∘ and 60 ∘ of flexion. Results. There were no redislocations in either group. There was no difference in IKDC ( = 0.16), Kujala ( = 0.43), Tegner ( = 0.12), or VAS ( = 0.05) scores at follow-up. There were no differences between repair and reconstruction in torque generation of the involved side at 30 ∘ ( = 0.96) and 60 ∘ ( = 0.99). In addition, there was no side to side difference in torque generation or surface EMG activation of VL or VMO. Conclusions. There were minimal differences found between patients undergoing MPFL repair and MPFL reconstruction for the objective and subjective evaluations in this study

Small (3.2-mm), Short, Oblique Patellar Tunnels for Patellar Fixation in MPFL Reconstruction

Multiple techniques exist for patellar graft fixation during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, each with their respective advantages and disadvantages. In recent studies, the use of 2 small (3.2-mm), short, oblique patellar tunnels with looped graft has been shown to be effective for patellar fixation during MPFL reconstruction. This technique does not appear to be associated with the same risk of patellar fracture as the use of larger (4.5-mm) transpatellar tunnels. A recent retrospective study also reported decreased risk of recurrent patellar instability and decreased cost compared with the use of suture anchors for patellar fixation, which is currently the most common modality. Given these promising findings relative to existing techniques for patellar fixation, further description of the senior author’s technique for using these small (3.2-mm), short, oblique patellar tunnels is provided. This technique is safe, efficacious, and cost-conscious and should be considered a viable option for patellar fixation during MPFL reconstruction

Outside-in Repair Technique for a Complete Radial Tear of the Lateral Meniscus

The lateral meniscus is vital in dissipating the force in the lateral compartment of the knee. A complete radial tear of the meniscus can lead to extrusion, rendering it nonfunctional and resulting in deleterious arthritic changes to the lateral compartment. Arthroscopic repair of a complete radial tear of the lateral meniscus poses a challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. Although some would advocate for meniscectomy, we present a technique for an outside-in repair using 3 sutures and standard arthroscopic portals. Overall, this provides for an excellent reduction of the meniscus

Clinical and Functional Outcomes following Primary Repair versus Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament for Recurrent Patellar Instability

Background. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair or reconstruction. Methods. Fourteen knees that underwent MPFL repair and nine (F5, M4) knees that underwent reconstruction at our institution were evaluated for objective and subjective outcomes. The mean age at operation was 20.1 years for repair and 19.8 years for reconstruction. All patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up (range: 24–75 months). Patient subjective outcomes were obtained using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Kujala patellofemoral subjective evaluations, as well as Visual Analog (VAS) and Tegner Activity Scales. Bilateral isometric quadriceps strength and vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) and vastus lateralis (VL) surface EMG were measured during maximal isometric quadriceps contractions at 30° and 60° of flexion. Results. There were no redislocations in either group. There was no difference in IKDC (P=0.16), Kujala (P=0.43), Tegner (P=0.12), or VAS (P=0.05) scores at follow-up. There were no differences between repair and reconstruction in torque generation of the involved side at 30° (P=0.96) and 60° (P=0.99). In addition, there was no side to side difference in torque generation or surface EMG activation of VL or VMO. Conclusions. There were minimal differences found between patients undergoing MPFL repair and MPFL reconstruction for the objective and subjective evaluations in this study